top of page
download-pdf-hi.png

How to Cite This article

R.R. Poznanski and E. Alemdar (2025). The ‘hidden’ structure of uncertainties unfolding through poststructural dynamics of the entropic brain.. Journal of Multiscale Neuroscience, 3(4): 264-273.

DOI:   https://doi.org/10.56280/1667295098

 

Roman figure.png

Author Affiliation

      R.R. Poznanski

      BION Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

      Integrative Neuroscience Initiative  AUS

      E. Alemdar

      Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University,Turkey

      Integrative Neuroscience Initiative  AUS​​​​​​

      Received   18 December 2024

              

      Accepted:  27 December 2024  

      Online Published: 3 January 2025

Comment for this article

​​​

                            The ‘hidden’ structure of uncertainties unfolding through poststructural                                                                       dynamics of the entropic brain

BRIEF REPORT

semi_check.png

Publication:   Journal of Multiscale Neuroscience     DOI: https://doi.org/10.56280/1667295098

 

Abstract

​A new approach attempts to express the poststructural dynamics of the entropic brain in terms of the ‘hidden’ structure of uncertainties.  By incorporating poststructural dynamics into our understanding of the physical, we can more clearly grasp how consciousness operates within a functional system approach that appropriately considers changeable boundary conditions through functional interactions. The causality is sought in boundary conditions when uncertainty reduction becomes an act of understanding as a course of action that navigates the multiscale landscape of potentialities. Motion through the multiscale landscape continuously changes uncertainties into intentionalities via ‘multiscale redundancy.’ In the multiscale version of the entropic brain, the ‘hidden’ structure of uncertainties unfolding through the poststructural dynamics occurring at different locations, levels, and times that instantly actualize through intermittent interactions as precognitive experienceabilities and combine into a global resonance before returning to spontaneous potentiality. The entropic brain is the ‘hidden’ structure of uncertainties unfolding through poststructural dynamics in the transition from potentialities to intentionalities, giving form to action via quantum potential energy and then motion via quantum kinetic energy through new information pathways. These self-referential pathways enable one to predict the minimal uncertainty as the ‘quantum of information’ functionality. It also suggests that reducing uncertainty is an act of understanding that could, in principle, mimic the conscious experience in artificial intelligence by transcending neural computability and, therefore, highlighting the importance of self-referentiality as the mechanism of ‘affective drive’ in broadcasting multiscale redundancy in the landscape of action.

Keyword: Entropic brain, ‘affective drive’, multiscale redundancy, functional interactions, intentionality, poststructural dynamics, minimum uncertainty, negentropic gain, self-referentiality

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

This article belongs to the Special Issue                
Multiscalar brain adaptability in AI Systems
Lead Editor:
                       Dr. Shantipriya Parida
                       Senior Scientist
                       Silo AI,  Helsinki, Finland

 

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Neural Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the CC BY 4.0 license.

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, Neural Press™  or the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Reference:
Aru,J.,  Suzuki, M. & Larkum, M.E. (2020) Cellular mechanisms of conscious processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24, 814-825.

 

Aru,J.,  Matthew E. Larkum,M.E. & Shine, J.M. (2023) The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience. Trends in Neuroscience 46, 1008-1017.

 

Asano,M., Basieva,I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Tanaka,Y. &Yamato, I. (2015) Quantum information biology: from information interpretation of quantum mechanics to applications in molecular biology and cognitive psychology. Foundations of Physics 45, 1362-1378.

 

Bohm, D. (1989) Meaning and information. In, P. Pylkkanen The Search for Meaning-The New Spirit in Science and Philosophy. Crucible Books, Swindon, UK.

 

Bourget, D. (2010) Consciousness is underived intentionality. Noûs 44, 32 – 58.

Brown, M.R. (1997) The quantum potential: the breakdown of classical symplectic symmetry and the energy of localization and dispersion. arXiv:quant-ph/9703007 (preprint).


Carhart-Harris,R.L., Leech,R., Hellyer,PJ Shanahan,M., Feilding,A. , Tagliazucchi,E.  et al. (2014) The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 20.Top of Form
 

Chalmers, D.J. (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, 200-219.

Chauvet, G.A. (1996) Theoretical Systems in Biology: Hierarchical and Functional Integration. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

Chauvet,G.A. (2004) The Mathematical Nature of the Living World: The Power of Integration. World Scientific Publishers, Singapore.

Back  back.png
bottom of page